Review policy
How a track earns a place
This is a draft of the public policy. It describes intent; the review workflow itself is not built yet.
The process
- Application. The artist describes the work, how AI was used and the rights position.
- Automated checks. File and format checks assist the reviewer. They never approve a track.
- Rights check. Provider, creation date, licensing, source audio, samples, covers, remixes, voice identity, artwork, video and streaming permission are each verified.
- Human listening review. A person judges musical quality, genre understanding and creative intent. Traditional and experimental work are assessed on their own terms.
- Decision. Approved work is published with a short curator reason. Detailed scoring is not made public.
Commitments
- AI involvement is always disclosed.
- No impersonation of real artists and no unauthorized voice cloning.
- No unauthorized samples, covers, remixes or copyrighted material.
- Unverified or pending work is never publicly playable.
- Artists may revise, resubmit and appeal a decision.
- A first review is targeted within 5 business days. That is a target, not a promise, and approval is not guaranteed.
- This is not a bulk-upload or mass-generation service.